The Knappertsbusch Parsifal
Greg Stanford
This 1951 Wieland Wagner/Hans Knappertsbusch Parsifal, which
reopened the postwar Bayreuth Festival, is the greatest Parsifal ever recorded
and here costs under $20.00! None of the singers has ever been surpassed on
other recordings and Knappertsbusch shows why he reigned supreme as the greatest
of all conductors of Wagner's final masterpiece. The 1951 mono sound is fine,
though most will want a second recording in modern sound (I'd recommend the
Solti) as an occasional alternative. But this is the performance you will always
come back to, as no other recording can ever completely satisfy after hearing
this one. Since Knappertsbusch could never adapt to studio recording conditions,
one must hear his work in a live performance to understand and appreciate this
musical giant's extraordinary gifts. No libretto is supplied, but most listeners
will already have one anyway. RUN now to your computer and snap up this bargain.
Then welcome to Wagner's world, for this is your pass
|
|
|
|
|
Met
1966 Turandot
Puccini:
Turandot [New York -- December 3, 1966; Birgit Nilsson,
Franco
Corelli,
Mirella Freni, Bonaldo Giaiotti; Zubin Mehta]
|
|
|
Best
Ever Met Turandot Broadcast 12-3-66
Greg
Stanford
This review is from: Puccini:
Turandot [New York -- December 3, 1966; Birgit Nilsson, Franco Corelli,
Mirella Freni, Bonaldo Giaiotti; Zubin Mehta] (Audio CD)
This 1966 Met Turandot surpasses the more famous
1961 Stokowski broadcast, also with Nilsson and Corelli. As is well-known,
the singers and chorus in 1961 had a great deal of trouble following
Stokowski's batonless and vague cues. Both the legendary Turandot and
Calaf, still unrivalled, offer surer and clearly better performances under
Mehta, particularly Corelli, who here gives easily the best of his various
available performances of his signature role, his constant artistic
progress in the part in the 5 years since the '61 effort clearly evident
here, while the voice, of course, is still in pristine form. Freni is
ideal, barring some excessive "crying" after her Act One aria.
This is THE Turandot to own. Why, oh why, did the Met choose the 1961
performance over this one for their own official release? Obviously
because of Stokowski's great fame. Incidentally, this 1966 broadcast was
the first ever Saturday matinee broadcast from the "new" Met at
Lincoln Center, the 1st this writer, then age 19, ever heard, and on
rehearing it often beginning 45 years later, I was better able to evaluate
its excellence. Once heard, this will inevitably be the Turandot of
choice, despite the audio superiority of Nilsson's 2 studio recordings,
the 1st with Bjorling, the 2nd with Corelli. Buy it and find out what
you've been missing when any other team has subsequently performed it.
Incidentally, if you are dubious about the variable Mehta, don't be. Mehta
excels here too, keeping his enormous forces under firm control without straight-jacketing his formidable
leading duo. |
|
|
La
Scala 1964
Turandot
|
|
|
Yes,
Great, But Not the Best,
Greg
Stanford
I've read all the reviews here and have owned
this '64 La Scala performance for years. Some of the reviewers seem
surprised by the "inferior" sound quality. Clearly, they don't
have much experience listening to off the air live performances of the
'60's and earlier. No one goes to these priceless performances for sound
quality, but for the special joys that live performance before an audience
can offer, particularly with such artists as Corelli or conductor Hans
Knappertsbusch, high among prominent examples of performers who just
couldn't usually deliver their best under studio conditions. These were
theatre creatures, their true stature revealed only there. Also, the cuts
objected to by some reviewers were standard practice everywhere then; for
sound quality or absolute completeness, such live performances can't be
expected to match studio recordings.
That said, I still greatly prefer the '66 Met performance with the same
star duo, with Freni and Mehta (see my review of that one) and the '61
Stokowski will be preferred by some. Many knowledgeable listeners
considered this '64 version the best up to that time, but 2 years down the
road, Nilsson and Corelli, particularly the tenor, surpassed themselves
again. As for Sutherland and Pavarotti, despite some fine singing, they
were far out of their respective elements when compared with the real
thing for this opera, the Valkyrie and the Supertenor.
Generally, I yield to no one in my admiration for Bjorling, but Turandot
was hardly the best opera to showcase the wonders of Bjorling's art,
despite his beautiful singing in Calaf's 2 arias (but check out his 1944
recording of "Nessun dorma" for something really amazing).
Turandot was never in his repertory and shouldn't have been.
My recommendation: get the studio recording of your choice and also the 3
Nilsson/Corelli live performances mentioned above and choose for yourself.
I'm betting that the Met '66 version will be your favorite too. |
|